| The aim of the study was to examine the effects of different photoperiod and light integral on floral initiation, ¬ã¨s¥Ø¼Ð±´°Q¤£¦P¥ú¶g´Á©M¿n¥ú¶q¦bªá¤§³Ð©lªº¼vÅT
development and subsequent growth of Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn. ¬v®Ü±ð«á¨Óªº¥Íªø©Mµo¨|
Six-weeks-old seedlings of ¡¥Echo Blue¡¦ and ¡¥Fuji Deep Blue¡¦ were placed under short day (SD, 10 h) and were transferred to long days (LD, 20 h) at 2-week intervals from 6 to 14 weeks after seeding. ¡¥Echo Blue¡¦ and ¡¥Fuji Deep Blue ¦b]¤ì¤»Ó¬P´Á¤j®ÉºØ´Ó µM«á©ñ¸m¦bµu¤é·Ó10¤p®É2Ó¬P´Á«á²¾Âà¨ìªø¤é·Ó¤U6¨ì14©P. Plants initiated flower buds regardless of light regimes. Flower bud initiation was delayed by SD compared to LD; ´Óª«ªáªÞ¤§³Ð©l ¤£ºÞ¥ú¶q.¦bµu¤é·Ó¤UªáªÞ³Q©µ¿ð©óªø¤é·Ó¤ñ¸û¤§¤U. plants transferred after 6 weeks from seeding initiated flower buds at least 21 and 10 days earlier at LD at high (HL) and, low (LL) daily light integral respectively ªáªÞÂಾºØ´Ó¤§«á6©P¦Ü¤Ö21.¦10¤ÑÓ§O¦a¦b high (HL) ¤é²Ö¿n¥ú¶q©Mlow (LL) ¤é²Ö¿n¥ú¶q.
, compared to those at SD. Light regimes had little or no effect on time to flower bud development after initiation. ¬Û¸û©óµu¤é·Ó¥ú¶q ´X¥G¨S¦³¼vÅT¦b¶}©l¤§«áªáªÞªºµo®i Thus, it seems likely that LD and HL affected the initiation rather than development. ¦]¦¹. ¥¦¦ü¥G¦³¥i¯à LD ©M HL ¼vÅT¤FªáªÞ¶}©l¨Ã«Dµo®i
Both the photoperiod and light integral strongly influenced the subsequent growth after initiation. SD delayed the time to visible bud (VB), ¥ú¶g´Á©M¥ú ±j¦³¤O¦a¼vÅT¶}©l«áªº¥Íªø.µu¤é·Ó©µ¿ð¤F©úÅ㪺ªÞ.
increased the number of nodes to first open flower, ¼W¥[ªº²Ä¤@²ô¸`¶}ªá¼Æ¥Ø number of branches, ¤ÀªKªº¼Æ¥Ø stem diameter and shoot dry weight compared to LD. ²ôª½®|©Mªác°®òñ«¶q¬Û¸û©óLD
HL promoted flowering and increased several shoot characteristics and flowering compared to LL. HL¤ñ¬Û¸û©óLL§ó¯à«P¶i¶}ªá´Á©M¼W¶i°¼®Ú¥Íªø¯S©Ê
| | |
|
|
|